
Michael Johnson is the man Baltimore Police believe allegedly killed Phylicia Barnes, and then transported her body out of a Northwest Baltimore apartment.
Just days after Baltimore Police took Michael Johnson into custody and charged him with the murder of 16-year-old Monroe honors student Phylicia Barnes; state prosecutors unsealed the first degree murder indictment against him. For the first time particulars of the case against Johnson were made public. Cops say the pretty little girl died from asphyxiation at the hands of Johnson at the Northwest Baltimore apartment where the studious teen had been staying with her half-sister over the Christmas Holiday in 2010. The details were disclosed during Johnson’s Bail hearing on Friday April 27, 2012. The court denied bail for Johnson citing he poses a threat to society, especial those he is close to (more on that detail later). The hearing revealed other details as well, and the state said it believed Johnson carried the child out of the apartment in a large container. Early on in the investigation TPC reported that Johnson had allegedly been seen by a neighbor struggling to carry a large container in the hallway of the building where the child was last seen. Bryan Barnes, the late teens’ older half-brother made these facts known during an interview here on TPC. Barnes also said that police cadaver dogs lost his kid sister’ scent just footsteps away from where Michael Johnson’s car had been parked earlier on the day Phylicia went missing. The public had wrestled with how the child was either led or taken from the apartment unnoticed, but apparently the cops believe someone did in fact see something that day, and the container Johnson was carrying had the body of Phylicia Barnes inside it. It will be very interesting to see the state’s entire case along with the rest of the evidence they believe they have which incriminates Johnson in this murder case, because the eyewitness account of him struggling with a large container is mere circumstantial. After all, he was moving out of the apartment and the state must demonstrate other compelling evidence that more than likely, Johnson was carrying the Barnes kid in that large container. Also, the state revealed other disturbing details about the case. Prosecutors say that Johnson had text messaged the Barnes teen over 500 times during the months leading up to her planed Baltimore visit. They say the child confided in an older sister stating, “I don’t like the way he looks at me”. That information had already been made public and its common knowledge that the teen was concerned after one of the volume of males who frequented Deena Barnes’ apartment, made a pass at her. We now know that the child was talking about Michael Johnson. The state didn’t reveal which older sister Phylicia raised these concerns with, but it’s just disturbing that the child wasn’t snatched out of Baltimore when it was known Johnson was texting the 16-year-old child. At the very least Deena Barnes should have been aware if for no other reason but to inquire about the hundreds of text Johnson made to Phylicia. It just seems that another missed opportunity occurred that would have enabled the girl’s siblings to get her away or limit her contact with Johnson. More importantly though, if Deena was involved in the streaking incident when Phylicia took off her clothes and ran around nude with Michael and other males, it probably wouldn’t have matter if Deena knew about the text anyway. Much of the state’s information thus far is compelling, but they must prove murder to make the charges stick. Calls intercepted by cops in which Johnson discussed moving to another country that doesn’t have extradition authority to the United States, just maybe the kind of evidence that seal Johnson’s fate in this case. An audio tape disclosing such a conversation in open court would be extremely damaging to the defense. Jurors would more than likely take note of such details, solely based on the mindset that an innocent person wouldn’t have to flee to territories out of the reach of the American Justice System. Moreover, Johnson himself must be aware that very damaging evidence against him exist, and the earlier comment in this article describing the judge’ concern that Johnson would be a danger to society especially those closes to him, tends to imply that some of his own family and friends have made damaging statements against him, and the judge may feel that Johnson would retaliate against his own clan. It seems as if the wall of silence has already begun to crumble in this senseless tragic ordeal.
The People’s Champion
I’m David Adams
RSS Feed
Twitter













